Worked example · Mathematics

Exact answers, and where they run out

Most calculators turn everything into a decimal the moment you press equals, and a decimal is a lossy copy of most fractions. This page shows what is kept when a calculator refuses to do that — exact fractions, and a π that is still π when the next function asks — then finds the edge, because the edge is real and a page that only showed the good half would be advertising.

Step 1 — fractions stay fractions

A third plus a sixth is a half, and it says so

Add ⅓ and ⅙ by hand and you put them over a common denominator: 2/6 + 1/6 = 3/6 = ½. Exact, and no decimal involved at any point. Type the same thing in:

  • (
  • 1
  • ÷
  • 3
  • )
  • +
  • (
  • 1
  • ÷
  • 6
  • )
  • =
Ans on iPhone showing open bracket 1 divided by 3 close bracket plus open bracket 1 divided by 6 close bracket on the input line and the result displayed as the fraction one half.
The answer arrives as 1/2, not 0.5. Frac⇄Dec — SHIFT on the fraction key — swaps between the two, in both directions.

That matters when the answer carries on into the next line. A third stored as 0.3333333333 is already wrong in the eleventh digit, and three of them add up to 0.9999999999 rather than 1. Kept as ⅓, three of them are exactly 1 — which is the answer a person would give.

One decimal point changes the whole line. Ans shows a fraction unless your input contained a decimal point or a ×10^ exponent — so (1÷3)+(1÷6) gives 1/2, while (1÷3)+0.5 gives 0.8333333333. The rule is that the calculator answers in the language you asked in, and the moment you introduce a decimal you have said you want decimals.

Step 2 — π, kept as π

Why sin(π) is 0 and sin(3.141592654) is not

π is not 3.141592654. That is a ten-figure approximation, and the difference shows up the moment you do something sensitive with it. The sine of π is exactly zero — that is what π is, the point where the sine curve comes back to the axis. Ask for it in radians both ways:

  • sin
  • π
  • )
  • =

The display is not where the exactness lives. Press π and = on its own and you get 3.141592654 — ten figures, like any other number, because that is what a ten-figure display can show. Nothing symbolic appears on screen. What is kept is underneath, in the value the next function receives, and the pair of answers above is the proof: the same π that printed as digits went into sin as π.

Four ten-billionths is not an error worth worrying about on its own. It is worth understanding: the calculator holds rational multiples of π as multiples of π, so anything that lands on a clean value comes out clean — sin(π) and tan(π) are 0, cos(2π) is 1, and sin(π÷6) is exactly 0.5 rather than 0.4999999999. Type the digits instead and you are asking a slightly different question, and getting an honest answer to it.

This is a small mercy with a large cousin. The same idea is why exact fractions matter in a long calculation: every rounding is a tiny lie, and lies accumulate. Keeping the exact form until the last possible moment is the single most effective habit in numerical work, and it costs nothing.

Step 3 — the other instrument's answer

A graph can only measure π, never know it

Ask the graph the same question. Plot the sine curve in radians and find where it crosses the axis:

f₁(x) = sin(x)

Ans Graph: the sine curve in radians with its crossing of the x-axis marked at 3.142 and reported as a root.
Root reads the crossing as 3.142 — π, stated to the resolution a five-unit window earns, with f(x) ≈ 3×10⁻¹⁶ beside it.

That is the honest difference between the two instruments, and it is not a deficiency in either. The graph searched for the crossing and reports what it found, with an uncertainty attached. The calculator did not search: it recognised π as π and folded the sine symbolically, so its zero has no uncertainty at all.

Numerical methods find answers that no formula can reach — that is what the cos x = x page is about. Exact methods give answers that no measurement can match. A page that pretends either one is simply better than the other has not used both.

Step 4 — the edge

Where the exactness stops

Ans keeps two families exactly and no others: fractions with whole-number tops and bottoms, and rational multiples of π. That list is deliberate rather than unfinished — those two cover the answers school and A-level work actually produces, and each has a compact exact form a calculator can carry through a calculation without a computer algebra system behind it. Everything else becomes a decimal at the point it is computed. So there are no surds, and there is a ceiling.

√2 is a decimal here

√2 gives 1.414213562, not a symbol. There is no exact form kept for it, so a chain of surds will drift in the last digits where a symbolic system would stay perfect. If your working needs √2 to survive as √2, it has to survive on your paper.

And there is a ceiling

The engine works up to — but not including — 10100. Factorials cross that line in one step, which makes them the neatest way to see it:

An instrument that stopped quietly, or wrapped round to a small number, or offered infinity, would be worse than one that refuses. Math ERROR is a complete answer to the question "can you hold this?" — and knowing exactly where the boundary sits, at 10100 inclusive, means you can work out in advance whether a calculation will reach it.

Check your own numbers

What is kept, and what is not

Type these and compare. RAD for the trigonometry.
ExpressionAnswerKept exactly?
(1÷3)+(1÷6)1/2yes, as a fraction
(1÷2)+(1÷3)5/6yes
(1÷3)+0.50.8333333333no — a decimal was asked for
sin(π)0yes, as a π multiple
sin(3.141592654)−4.102070669×10⁻¹⁰no — π was rounded first
π3.141592654yes, underneath — the display has no symbol for it
√21.414213562no — no surds are kept
69!1.711224524×10⁹⁸within range
70!Math ERRORpast 10¹⁰⁰

What to watch

  • Exact fractions are held with whole-number tops and bottoms. A calculation that overflows those falls back to decimals silently — correct, but no longer exact.
  • Only rational multiples of π are folded symbolically. π² and eπ are decimals like anything else.
  • Trigonometric functions of ordinary angles are computed, not derived: sin(60°) is 0.8660254038, not √3/2. The exactness here is about fractions and π, not about surds.
  • Decimal answers are shown to ten significant figures from fifteen held internally, so what you see is already one rounding away from what the next line will use. A fraction has no such gap.
  • The 10100 ceiling is inclusive: 1×10⁹⁹ × 10 is a Math ERROR, not 10¹⁰⁰.

Next: solving equations, where a numerical method finds an answer that no exact form can reach.