Worked example · Physics

Inverse-square law: intensity from a point source

A small source radiates 1,200 W equally in every direction. What is the intensity 3 m away, and how far away has it fallen to 2 W m−2? The square is not an arbitrary rule: it comes from the area of the sphere over which the same power is spread.

Step 1 — on paper

Why doubling distance quarters the intensity

At distance r, radiation from an ideal point source is spread over a sphere of area 4πr2. Intensity is power per unit area:

I=P4πr2
  • I intensity in W m−2 · P total radiated power in W · r distance from the point source in m

Double r and the sphere's area becomes 22 = 4 times larger. The same power is divided among four times the area, so the intensity is one quarter. Triple the distance and intensity becomes one ninth. It is 1/r2, not 1/r.

Relative intensity from the same ideal point source.
DistanceSphere area factorIntensity factor
r11
2r41/4
3r91/9
10r1001/100
Step 2 — on the calculator

Intensity 3 m from a 1,200 W source

Substitute P = 1200 W and r = 3 m. Keep the entire sphere area in the denominator; the brackets make that visible:

  • 1200
  • ÷
  • (
  • 4
  • ×
  • π
  • ×
  • 3
  • )
  • =
Ans on iPhone showing 1200 divided by, open bracket, 4 times pi times 3 squared, close bracket, and the result 10.61032954.
The expression remains above the result, so the squared distance and the whole 4πr² denominator can be checked before trusting the digits.

At 1 m the intensity would be 95.493 W m−2. At 3 m, one ninth of that is 10.610 W m−2, providing a quick independent check.

Do not square the power. The square belongs to distance because the receiving sphere grows in two dimensions. The source still emits 1,200 joules each second; only the area over which those joules are spread changes.

Step 3 — turn the formula round

Where does the intensity fall to 2 W m−2?

Rearrange before substituting. Multiply by r2, divide by I, then take the positive square root because distance is positive:

r=P4πI=12008π=6.909882989 m

The threshold is reached at about 6.91 m. Beyond that, the idealised intensity is below 2 W m−2; closer than that, it is above. Substitution closes the loop: 1200÷(4π×6.9098829892) ≈ 2.

Intensity from the 1,200 W ideal source.
DistanceIntensityCompared with 1 m
1 m95.493 W m−21
2 m23.873 W m−21/4
3 m10.610 W m−21/9
6 m2.653 W m−21/36
6.910 m2.000 W m−2about 1/47.75
10 m0.95493 W m−21/100
Step 4 — on the graph

Find the threshold as an intersection

Plot the intensity against positive distance and add the 2 W m−2 threshold. The function rises without bound as x approaches zero, so start the window at 1 m rather than asking the graph to include the point-source singularity. Then keep the ceiling low: y from 0 to 12 still shows the 10.6 W m−2 reading at 3 m, and leaves the 2 W m−2 crossing clear of the axis. A window tall enough for the 95 W m−2 at 1 m would squash that crossing into the bottom edge. Use x from 1 to 10, then choose Intersection.

f₁(x) = 1200/(4*pi*x^2)    f₂(x) = 2

Ans Graph showing an inverse-square intensity curve falling with distance and crossing the horizontal 2 watts per square metre line near 6.91 metres.
Intersection — the curve meets 2 W m−2 at about 6.91 m, agreeing with the rearranged square-root formula.

The plot makes the sensitivity visible. Close to the source, a small move changes intensity sharply; farther away the same move matters much less. The curve never reaches zero, although at a large enough distance other sources and background effects will dominate the ideal model.

When the inverse-square model is valid

  • The source is small compared with the distance, so it can be treated as a point.
  • It radiates equally in every direction. A reflector, lens, loudspeaker enclosure or antenna pattern can concentrate power instead.
  • The medium does not absorb or scatter energy, and there are no reflections or obstacles.
  • The quoted 1,200 W is the power carried by the radiation of interest, not necessarily the device's electrical input power.
  • The receiver is small and faces the incoming radiation normally; orientation changes the intercepted power.
  • Near an extended source or in the electromagnetic near field, geometry can differ and the simple 1/r² law need not apply.

Next: photon energy from wavelength for another radiation calculation, or projectile motion for a model whose assumptions change the answer visibly.